Recent business experience of the Directors is set forth above under "Election of Directors." Recent business experience of the executive officers who are not also Directors is as follows:

     Walter T. Erazmus has been President of the Company since June 1999. Prior thereto, he served as Executive Vice President - Finance of the Company and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since November 1994 and of Gibraltar New York since 1977. He was Vice President - Finance of the Company and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from its formation until November 1994.

     Joseph A. Rosenecker was Executive Vice President of the Company from November 1994 through January 2002. He served as Vice President - Sales of the Company from its formation until November 1994 and was the director of Gibraltar New York's cold-rolled strip operations from 1989 through January 2002. He was President of Gibraltar New York's strip and strapping divisions from 1978 to 1989.

     Carl P. Spezio has been Executive Vice President of the Company since November 1994 and has served as President of its Heat Treating Group since 1996. Prior thereto, he was Vice President - Manufacturing and Quality Control of the Company since its formation. He was President of the Gibraltar Metals Division of Gibraltar New York from 1977 to 1989.

     Eric R. Lipke has been Vice President of the Company since its formation. Mr. Lipke has held various positions with Gibraltar New York since 1976 primarily in the areas of administration and executive support.

     Henning Kornbrekke has been Vice President of the Company since he joined it in January 2002. Mr. Kornbrekke serves as President of the Company's Building Products Group. Prior thereto, Mr. Kornbrekke served as the Chief Executive Officer of a division of Rexam, PLC and before that as President and General Manager of the hardware division of the Stanley Works.

     Kenneth W. Matz has been Vice President of the Company since February 2002. Mr. Matz serves as President of the Company's flat-rolled operations since February 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Matz was Vice President and General Manager of the Company's Gibraltar Strip Steel flat-rolled division.

     John E. Flint was named Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company in 1999. He was Vice President of Accounting of the Company since its incorporation and of Gibraltar New York since 1985, and prior thereto served as Corporate Controller of Gibraltar New York. Mr. Flint began his career with the Company as Controller of the Gibraltar Metals Division of Gibraltar New York in 1977.

     Richard A. Pytak Jr. was named Treasurer of the Company in 1999 and has been with the Company since June 1998. Prior thereto Mr. Pytak was a Senior Manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with fourteen years of experience providing public accounting and business advisory services.

     The following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation earned by the Company's Chief Executive Officer, and each of the Company's other four most highly compensated executive officers, for the Company's fiscal years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001.

     There were no grants of stock options to the named executives in 2001.

     The following table sets forth information with respect to the named executives concerning the exercise of options during 2001 and unexercised options held at the end of 2001.

________________________________

     In July 1998, the Company entered into a new Employment Agreement with Brian J. Lipke (the "Employment Agreement"). Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Lipke serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company at an annual base salary of $379,200. This base salary is subject to annual adjustment as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. In addition to his base salary, Mr. Lipke is eligible to participate in the Company's Executive Incentive Bonus Plan and other employee benefit plans available to the Company's executive officers. The Employment Agreement has an initial term of five years, which automatically is extended for an additional one-year period on each anniversary date, unless either party gives notice of intent to terminate.

     The Employment Agreement provides that if the Company terminates Mr. Lipke without cause, he shall be entitled to receive a lump sum benefit equal to 2 1/2 times his total cash compensation for the 12-month period immediately preceding the date of his termination. In addition, upon a termination of Mr. Lipke's employment other than by the Company for "cause" (as defined in the Employment Agreement) and other than voluntarily by Mr. Lipke, if he becomes entitled to receive benefits under any of the Company's tax-qualified retirement plans (the "Plans"), he will be entitled to receive from the general assets of the Company an additional benefit computed as if the Plans were not subject to any applicable limits imposed on such plans by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (the "Code"), or the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

     If Mr. Lipke dies during the term of the Employment Agreement, in addition to any death benefits payable under life insurance maintained by the Company and any death benefits payable under the Company's employee benefit plans, the Company will pay to the estate of Mr. Lipke a death benefit equal to 50% of his annual base salary plus an amount equal to all bonuses he would have received through the end of the then current fiscal year. If he becomes permanently disabled, Mr. Lipke will be entitled to receive from the Company annual benefits equal to his base salary, subject to a cap of $200,000 (adjusted for cost of living increases), less amounts received under any pension, profit sharing or disability plan or insurance policy.

     In the event Mr. Lipke's employment with the Company is terminated other than for cause, the Company will continue to provide medical, disability and life insurance benefits to Mr. Lipke and his family for life.

     Mr. Lipke has agreed in the Employment Agreement that, in the event he terminates his employment other than following a change in control, he will not, for a period of one year after the date of termination, participate in any "competitive operation," as defined in the Employment Agreement.

     In 2001, none of the executive officers of the Company served on the compensation committee or on any other committee of the board of directors performing similar functions of any other entity, any of whose officers or directors served on the Company's Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

     The Company has entered into change in control agreements (the "Change in Control Agreements") with each of the named executive officers and certain other executive officers. Generally, each executive officer (other than Brian J. Lipke) is entitled to receive, upon termination of employment within two years of a "Change in Control" (unless such termination is because of death or disability, by the Company for "Cause" as defined in the Change in Control Agreements), a lump sum severance payment equal to 225% times the sum of (i) his current annual salary and (ii) the average of the annual bonuses paid to him during the three years immediately preceding the year in which the change in control occurs. The Stay Agreements (as discussed below) amended the Change in Control Agreements to provide that the amount of any payment an executive officer (other than Brian J. Lipke) is entitled to receive under the Change in Control Agreements will be reduced by an am ount equal to the second half of the payments such Executive Officer is entitled to receive pursuant to his Stay Agreement. In the case of Brian J. Lipke, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, whether or not such Change in Control results in a termination of his employment, he is entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment equal to 350% times the sum of (i) his current annual salary and (ii) the highest annual bonus paid to him during the three years immediately preceding the year in which the change in control occurs. The Change in Control Agreements define such total cash compensation to include amounts deferred at the option of the executive. The payments and benefits payable in the event of a Change in Control are not subject to any limitations that would prevent them from being considered "excess parachute payments" subject to excise tax payments or corporate deduction disallowance under the Code. Therefore, such lump sum severance payments could require excise tax payments on the part of the executive, and result in a deduction disallowance on the part of the Company. In such instance, the impact of the excise tax payments on the executive would be reimbursed to the executive by the Company, including taxes the executive would incur on the reimbursement itself. The events that trigger a Change in Control under the Change in Control Agreements include (i) the acquisition of 30% or more of the Company's outstanding Common Stock by certain persons, (ii) certain changes in the membership of the Company's Board of Directors, (iii) certain mergers or consolidations, (iv) certain sales or transfers of substantially all of the Company's assets and (v) the approval of the shareholders of the Company of a plan of dissolution or liquidation.

     This report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors provides an overview of the Company's compensation philosophy and executive compensation programs. It discusses compensation-related decisions in general for executive officers, and specifically those relating to the Company's Chief Executive Officer, for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001.

     The Company's Executive Compensation Program is designed to attract and retain top-quality executives and to provide them with both an incentive and a reward for superior performance. The program includes three principal components - base salary, annual financial performance-based bonus opportunities and long-term incentives. The program is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Members of the Compensation Committee are outside Directors who are not employees of the Company.

     The primary philosophy of the Company's Executive Compensation Program is to align the financial interests of its executive officers with those of the Company and its stockholders by basing a significant portion of each executive officer's compensation upon his individual performance and the Company's financial performance and by encouraging executive officers to own Company stock through participation in various stock-based and other plans.

     The Compensation Committee is responsible for annually reviewing base salaries of executive officers, determining the design of the Company's Executive Incentive Bonus Plan and eligibility to participate therein, and making grants to eligible participants, including executive officers under the Company's stock-based long-term incentive plans.

     Base salary ranges are established annually, at competitive levels, for all executive officers. Base salaries are periodically adjusted to reflect each individual executive's performance, contribution to the overall financial results of the Company, and changes in competitive salary levels.

     To further support the Company's goal of enhancing shareholder value, an Executive Incentive Bonus Plan was adopted in 1998. Financial performance targets are established annually for the Company as a whole, and for certain individual subsidiaries.

     Bonuses paid under the Executive Incentive Bonus Plan for 2001 reflect, for corporate executives, the financial results of the total Company versus targets. For certain executives of individual subsidiaries, bonuses paid were based on a combination of the Company's and the individual subsidiaries' financial performance versus targets.

     The Compensation Committee administers the Company's Incentive Plan, the Gibraltar Steel Corporation Non-Qualified Plan (the Non-Qualified Plan) and Restricted Stock Plan. The Compensation Committee periodically grants options under the Incentive Plan to the Company's executive officers and other employees. All of the options granted have an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. The value of the options granted is wholly dependent on the increase in value of the Company's common stock, which serves as an incentive to the executive officers to maximize their efforts to promote the economic performance of the Company. All of the options granted are exercisable over a four-year period at the rate of 25% per year commencing one year from the date of grant. Accordingly, an executive officer must remain with the Company for at least four years in order to enjoy the full potential economic ben efit of the options awarded. The number of options awarded to a particular executive officer is directly related to his responsibilities and individual performance.

     The Compensation Committee periodically grants restricted stock to the Company's executive officers. These restricted stock grants are at a nominal cost per share to the executive officers and recognize the special contributions of the executive officers for their long service to date, together with their expected future contributions. Restrictions on stock granted under the Restricted Stock Plan lapse over periods established by the Compensation Committee at the time of each restricted stock award.

Accordingly, an executive officer must remain with the Company throughout the full term established by the Compensation Committee in order to enjoy the full potential economic benefit of the restricted stock awarded.

     In 2001, grants were not provided under the Incentive Plan, the Non-Qualified Plan or under the Restricted Stock Plan.

     Mr. Lipke participates in the same compensation programs provided to the Company's other executive officers. The Compensation Committee annually reviews Mr. Lipke's base salary, as covered in his employment agreement. A competitive salary range for the CEO is established with the assistance of an independent consultant. In determining salary adjustments within the set salary range, various factors are taken into account including individual performance, changes in competitive salaries and Company performance.

     In 2001, Mr. Lipke participated in the Executive Incentive Bonus Plan (the "Executive Plan") applicable to all executive officers. Since the Company's fiscal 2001 performance did not meet its target, Mr. Lipke and the other named executives were paid bonuses below the target levels in accordance with the terms of the Executive Plan.

     Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation in excess of $l,000,000 paid to a company's chief executive officer and any one of the four other most highly paid executive officers during its taxable year. Qualifying performance-based compensation is not subject to the deduction limit if certain requirements are met. Based upon the compensation paid to Mr. Lipke and the Company's other executive officers in 2001, it does not appear that the Section l62(m) limitation will have an impact on the Company in the near term. However, the Compensation Committee plans to review this matter periodically and to take such actions as are appropriate to minimize the impact of this statute, to the extent that there is no adverse effect on the Company's ability to provide incentive compensation based on Company financial performance.

     The Audit Committee currently consists of three directors, one of whom is not independent as defined in the listing standards of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD). Mr. Montague and Mr. Campbell are independent directors as defined by the rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Mr. Lippes is not an independent director within the meaning of those rules; however, there is no other member of the Board of Directors who is independent. Mr. Lippes' background and extensive business and financial experience both outside of his relationship with the Company and in connection with his past service on the Audit Committee have given him significant financial sophistication and knowledge. Therefore, the Board of Directors determined that it is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders that Mr. Lippes continue to serve as a member of the Audit Committee, notwithstanding that he is not an independent director. A b rief description of the responsibilities of the Audit Committee is set forth above under the caption "The Board of Directors and its Committees".

     The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company's audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001 with management of the Company. The Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company's independent auditors, the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 Communication with Audit Committees, which relates to the conduct of the audit, including the auditor's judgment about the quality of the accounting principles applied in the Company's 2001 audited financial statements. The Committee also has reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by Independence Standards Board No. 1 Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence.

     Based on the review and the discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company's audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     The Performance Graph shown below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on Common Stock, based on the market price of the Common Stock, with the total return of the S&P MidCap 400 Index and the S&P Iron & Steel Index for the five-year period ended December 31, 2001. The comparison of total return assumes that a fixed investment of $100 was invested on December 31, 1996 in Common Stock and in each of the foregoing indices and further assumes the reinvestment of dividends. The stock price performance shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG GIBRALTAR STEEL CORPORATION, THE S & P MIDCAP 400 INDEX
AND THE S & P IRON & STEEL INDEX

     The Compensation Committee is composed of Gerald S. Lippes and William P. Montague. Neither Mr. Lippes nor Mr. Montague was, during 2001 or prior thereto, an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In 2001, none of the executive officers of the Company or members of the Compensation Committee served on the compensation committee or on any other committee of the board of directors performing similar functions of any other entity, any of whose officers or directors served on the Company's Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

     All Directors other than Directors who are employees of the Company receive a retainer of $16,000 per year. In addition, each such Director also receives a fee of $1,000 for each Board of Directors or committee meeting attended and is reimbursed for any reasonable expenses incurred in attending such meetings.

     Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company's Directors and executive officers, and any persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file equity securities of the Company and other reports of initial ownership of Common Stock and subsequent changes in that ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish the Company with copies of all forms they file pursuant to Section 16(a).

     To the Company's knowledge, based solely upon a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, the Company believes that during the year ended December 31, 2001, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, Directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with.

     The following table sets forth information as of March 25, 2002 (except as otherwise noted) with respect to all stockholders known by the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of its outstanding Common Stock, each Director, each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation table above and all executive officers and Directors as a group.

                                            

*Less than 1%.

Vote Required. The affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of Common Stock present, in person or by proxy, is required for the election of each Director, assuming a quorum is present or represented at the meeting.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" the nominees for Class II Directors.

     The firm of Lippes, Silverstein, Mathias & Wexler LLP, of which Mr. Lippes, a Director of the Company, is a partner, serves as counsel to the Company. The firm of Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber, LLP, of which Mr. Russ, a Director of the Company, is a partner, also provided legal services to the Company in 2001.

     The Company's management does not presently know of any matters to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than the matters described in the Notice of Annual Meeting. However, if other matters are presented, the accompanying proxy confers upon the person or persons entitled to vote the shares represented by the proxy, discretionary authority to vote such shares in respect of any such other matter in accordance with their best judgment.

     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has been selected as the independent auditors for the Company's current fiscal year and has been the Company's independent auditors for its most recent year ended December 31, 2001.

     Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

     The fees for services rendered to the Company in 2001 by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were as follows:

     Audit Fees - For the audit of the Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001 and for reviews of the interim financial information included in the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for 2001: $144,000.

     Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees - For the year ended December 31, 2001: $0.

     All Other Fees - For services rendered to the Company, other than the services described above, for the year ended December 31, 2001: $156,000. These fees related primarily to services rendered in connection with the Company's secondary offering of its Common Stock, tax services and also to due diligence matters in connection with the Company's acquisition activities.

     The Audit Committee believes that the provision of the services described under "All Other Fees" above was compatible with maintaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's independence from the Company.

     THE COMPANY WILL PROVIDE WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH PERSON WHOSE PROXY IS SOLICITED, ON THE WRITTEN REQUEST OF SUCH PERSON, A COPY OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001, FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, INCLUDING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE SCHEDULES THERETO. Such written request should be directed to Gibraltar Steel Corporation, 3556 Lake Shore Road, PO Box 2028, Buffalo, New York 14219-0228, Attention: Neil E. Lipke. Each such request must set forth a good faith representation that, as of March 25, 2002, the person making the request was a beneficial owner of securities entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

     Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting must be received by the Company by December 6, 2002 to be considered for inclusion in the Company's Proxy Statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting.

     The accompanying Notice and this Proxy Statement are sent by order of the Board of Directors.

Dated: April 25, 2002

                                                                                                            

STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO EXECUTE THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ACCOMPANYING ENVELOPE, WHETHER OR NOT THEY EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING. A STOCKHOLDER MAY NEVERTHELESS VOTE IN PERSON IF HE OR SHE DOES ATTEND.